Talking about any of these predictions requires that we be able to use the future tense. And, there’s no time like the present to talk about the future, right?
For starters, let’s look at the inflection of a regular verb or two. Well: three… We’re going to concentrate on the particular future tense called simply the futur, as opposed to the futur proche. As the French Crazy web site explains it: while the futur proche or “near future” tense (the one formed with the verb aller) is used to refer to “events that are certain to occur and are happening relatively soon”, the futur “is used to talk about more general or distant future events. These events are slightly more uncertain because the amount of time needed to elapse is greater than the near future.” Here is the paradigm for the futur. I recommend that you listen to the pronunciations of even the regular -er verbs on the Tex’s French Grammar web site. For your convenience, I’m going to use the same examples as Tex:
nager (to swim) | réfléchir (to think) | rendre (to give back) | |
---|---|---|---|
je | nagerai | réfléchirai | rendrai |
tu | nageras | réfléchiras | rendras |
on | nagera | réfléchira | rendra |
nous | nagerons | réfléchirons | rendrons |
vous | nagerez | réfléchirez | rendrez |
ils/elles | nageront | réfléchiront | rendront |
It’s way too easy to confuse the future with the conditional, and we’re going to need both of them to form the compound tenses that we’ve been talking about lately, so let’s look at the potential points of confusion between the two.
The potential problem comes from the fact that both the futur and the conditionnel maintain the r sound of the infinitive. One of the linguist’s best approaches to everything is to look at “minimal contrasts,” so let’s try that.
In the first person singular (je), the futur and the conditionnel sound the same. This screws me up constantly when I’m listening to someone else. In writing, though, they are differentiated by the presence of a (silent) s in the conditional:
nager (to swim) | réfléchir (to think) | rendre (to give back) | |
---|---|---|---|
Future | je nagerai | je réfléchirai | je rendrai |
Conditional | je nagerais | je réfléchirais | je rendrais |
The tu and on (first person singular informal and third person singular) inflections are not very confusable, but the nous (first person plural) inflections are. Here the difference is that the conditional has an i:
nager (to swim) | réfléchir (to think) | rendre (to give back) | |
---|---|---|---|
Future | nous nagerons | nous réfléchirons | nous rendrons |
Conditional | nous nagerions | nous réfléchirions | nous rendrions |
There’s a similar “minimal contrast” in the vous (second person singular formal or second person plural) inflections:
nager (to swim) | réfléchir (to think) | rendre (to give back) | |
---|---|---|---|
Future | vous nagerez | vous réfléchirez | vous rendrez |
Conditional | vous nageriez | vous réfléchiriez | vous rendriez |
The ils/elles (third person plural) forms are pretty distinct, so we’ll skip those, too.
There are tons of verbs that are irregular in the future, so we’ll come back to the future in a future post. (Sorry.) There are also a number of differences in when the future tense versus the present tense get used in English versus French, and we’ll come back to those, too. In the meantime: I’m going to have a cup of coffee. (How many different ways have I formed the English future tense in this paragraph?)
One thought on “The US small arms market will sell $3,985,000,000 worth of firearms in 2020: the future tense in French”